Download a detailed performance comparison of Virtuozzo Storage vs. Ceph across backup, hot compute, and erasure-coded capacity workloads — all tested on comparable hardware and like-for-like scenarios.

See the numbers behind why more cloud and managed service providers are choosing Virtuozzo Storage instead of building on Ceph. The datasheet walks through test setup, methodology, and side-by-side results, so you can make a data-driven decision. 

  • How both platforms behave under backup pressure
    How throughput and concurrency scale as you increase the number of backup streams, and what that means for backup windows on growing clusters. 
  • Performance for hot, latency-sensitive workloads
    How Virtuozzo Storage and Ceph handle demanding VM and application workloads, including the impact of random reads/writes and mixed I/O patterns. 
  • Real usable capacity with erasure coding
    How much capacity you can practically use while maintaining resilience, and how each platform copes with data churn and rebalancing. 
  • Operational impact on your team
    The differences in configuration, tuning, and day-to-day operations, including expansion, recovery, and how “hands-on” your admins need to be. 
  • Implications for cost and hardware planning
    How performance and efficiency translate into hardware requirements, lifecycle planning, and overall TCO for service provider environments.

Complete the form to download the Virtuozzo Storage vs. Ceph performance datasheet and get the full benchmark results, configuration details, and architectural breakdown.